UK should consider cutting interest on bank BoE reserves – ex-deputy governor | Techy Kings

[ad_1]

LONDON, Nov 1 (Reuters) – Britain should consider changing the Bank of England’s policy to pay banks interest on the reserves they hold there, former BoE deputy governor Charlie Bean said on Tuesday.

Bean’s comments followed suggestions from another former BoE deputy governor, Paul Tucker, who said the government could save 30-45 billion pounds ($34-$52 billion) a year by moving to a system where banks would receive interest on a fraction of them. deposits at the BoE.

British banks hold around 950 billion pounds of reserves at the BoE, largely the result of more than 800 billion pounds of reserves created to pay for quantitative easing bond purchases that the central bank has yet to reverse.

Banks are paid interest on reserves at whatever the BoE’s current interest rate is – just 0.1% a year ago, but 2.25% now and expected to rise further.

Until recently, the government received the profits made by the BoE’s bond buying program when interest rates were low.

The trend has been reversed: now the government foots the bill for any losses the BoE incurs as it pays higher interest on bank reserves released for its QE programme.

With public finances under increasing pressure from energy bill support schemes and a stagnant economy, the cost of this liability is under increasing scrutiny.

“I think it’s one of those additional things to throw into the mix,” Bean said of changing the policy of paying interest on reserves, at an event for the Resolution Foundation think tank.

BoE Governor Andrew Bailey said the current system was important to transmit changes in the BoE’s official interest rate to the wider economy.

However Tucker, who was deputy governor from 2009 to 2013 and is now a researcher at Harvard University, said a similar effect could be achieved by paying interest on just 100 billion pounds of reserves.

Bean said the move to pay interest on only a fraction of reserves was effectively a fiscal weapon, as it took income away from banks.

“My guess is that if the Treasury is thinking of going down this route, they’d prefer to do it in the form of a bank tax,” Bean said.

Reporting by Andy Bruce Editing by Alexandra Hudson

Our Standards: Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

[ad_2]

Source link